PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine4 citations

Measuring the IMPACT: Pilot Validation of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma

View Full Paper
AZAaron L. ZebolskyTCTravis ClarkeMAMohammad H. Almomani

Key Points

  • IMPACT scores independently predicted quality-of-life in patients with craniomaxillofacial trauma, and reliability was determined high at above 0.8.
  • The pilot study employed mixed-methods validation via expert opinions and patient surveys to confirm the efficacy of the IMPACT measure.
  • Validation was successful with 53 patients, highlighting the modules focused on satisfaction, function, and psychosocial aspects of recovery.
  • The results reinforce the need for further validation of IMPACT to diversify and expand its cohort for broader applicability.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of validated, patient-reported outcome measures for quality-of-life (QOL) in craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma. Objective: To determine whether the Integrated Modular Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma (IMPACT) independently measures QOL in patients presenting for routine follow-up within 3 months of injury by comparing with the 15-Dimension QOL survey (15D). Methods: A mixed-methods, pilot validation was performed via literature review, expert opinion, patient interviews, and prospective survey collection. Criterion validity was determined by multivariable adjusted correlation coefficients (B) between IMPACT and 15D scores. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha (A). Results: General (IMPACT-G), Nasal (IMPACT-N), Orbit (IMPACT-O), and Jaw (IMPACT-J) modules were developed. Domains include overall satisfaction, facial function, facial appearance, psychosocial function, general symptoms, and pain. Validation was performed in 53 patients with CMF trauma who had mandible (n = 27, 50.1%), nasal (n = 10, 18.9%), zygomaticomaxillary complex (n = 7, 13.2%), Le Fort (n = 6, 11.3%), and/or other fracture patterns. IMPACT scores independently predicted QOL (B > |0.4|; p 0.8; p < 0.05). Conclusions: The IMPACT was developed to measure QOL in patients suffering CMF trauma, and results from this initial validation study warrant expansion to a larger, diversified cohort.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zebolsky et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4596631b076d99fa5c0b7https://doi.org/10.1177/26893614251378424
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The prevalence of psychological distress in a sample of facial trauma victims. A comparative cross-sectional study between UK and Australia2011 · 46 citations
  2. 2Maxillomandibular Fixation: Understanding the Risks and Benefits of Contemporary Techniques in Adults2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3The role of septoplasty in the management of nasal septum fracture: a randomized quality of life study2016 · 19 citations
  4. 4Quality of life in treatment of mandibular fractures using closed reduction and maxillomandibular fixation in comparison with open reduction and internal fixation – A randomized prospective study2014 · 40 citations
  5. 5The Role of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Value-Based Payment Reform2017 · 265 citations