This analysis compares R2*, R2, and QSM to histological iron data, suggesting their reliability as markers for non-heme iron.
Motivation: Multiple quantitative MR (qMR) metrics have been shown to be sensitive to brain iron. However, direct comparisons among these metrics and with histological iron data are limited. Goal(s): We aim to evaluate the effective (R2*) and irreversible (R2) transverse relaxation rates as well as quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in quantifying non-heme brain iron levels. Approach: We tested associations among qMR metrics and iron content estimated from histologically determined trajectories of iron accumulation in healthy young individuals. Results: While all metrics showed sensitivity to iron content, R2* is more robust in its association with histological estimates of iron from literature. Impact: This study examined MRI-based measures of non-heme brain iron, providing valuable insights into their reliability as iron markers across brain tissue types and their correspondence with histology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: