Improved precision in vascular perfusion assessments using DCE-MRF suggests greater clinical applicability for tumor evaluations.
Motivation: Conventional Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI methods to measure vascular perfusion are highly variable and rarely used fully in clinical practice. Goal(s): To improve the precision of tumor vascular perfusion measurements with Dynamic Contrast Enhanced - Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (DCE-MRF). Approach: We developed and validated our T1-only MRF DCE-MRF acquisition at 9.4T with phantoms and initial in vivo data of an orthotopic mouse model of 4T1 breast cancer. Results: Phantom DCE-MRF had up to 9.2x reduction in temporal variation compared to conventional DCE-MRI. In vivo results demonstrated sensitivity to gadolinium concentration uptake in the tumor, allowing for voxel-wise assessments of tumor vascular perfusion. Impact: Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI methods to measure tumor vascular perfusion rates are highly variable and thus rarely used in clinical practice. The proposed T1-only DCE-MRF acquisition provides assessments of vascular perfusion with significantly improved precision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacAskill et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: