Assessment shows improved image quality and consistency in abdominal QSM, suggesting better clinical reliability.
Motivation: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) has the potential for abdominal applications in assessing disease conditions, but the performance of different post-processing methods has not been fully evaluated, affecting reliability and clinical applicability. Goal(s): To evaluate various QSM post-processing method combinations for abdominal imaging and determine the most reliable pipeline. Approach: Multiple QSM post-processing method combinations were evaluated for image quality and consistency. Results: VSHARP combined with StarQSM or iterTik demonstrated higher subjective image quality scores, consistency of symmetrical organs, and low variability of ROIs, while PDF_StarQSM also demonstrated promising performance. Impact: Selecting the optimal post-processing method is crucial for enhancing the reliability of abdominal QSM, potentially improving clinical diagnostics and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: