Simulation study quantifies noise variance impacts on functional and dynamic connectivity, suggesting caution in interpretation.
Motivation: In fMRI, the interaction between the dynamics of different brain regions are commonly quantified by correlation-based techniques via (static) functional connectivity (FC)[1], or dynamic FC (DFC) analyses[2]. Goal(s): We aim to quantify the effects of task/condition-related signal variance to FC and DFC. Approach: We perform simulations of fMRI time-signals from different brain regions, compute FC and DFC under different task/conditions and various noise- and signal-variance levels. Results: Significant correlation was found across realizations, between FC and the standard deviations of fMRI time-signals; also, significant correlation across realizations was found between task/condition-related FC-difference and condition-related standard-deviation-difference; this issue was less significant in the DFC. Impact: This study reveals that caution should be taken while applying and interpreting (static) FC analyses of fMRI signals due to noise inflating FC; (dynamic) DFC analysis, capturing the dynamics of the variability, partially mitigates the inflation of FC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ünal Sakoğlu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: