Observational analysis finds SNR measurements may underestimate changes in images, suggesting better techniques needed.
Motivation: Improved SNR characterization of images with Deep Learning-based image reconstruction (DLR). Goal(s): To evaluate whether SNR measurements using improved noise estimates demonstrate expected SNR changes with common sequence acquisition modifications in images reconstructed using DLR. Approach: Sequentially acquired images were used to calculate theoretically accurate noise estimates in the brain and abdomen. Each dataset consisted of two sequentially acquired T2-weighted series. Five distinct SNR estimates were calculated from the same data. Results: SNR estimates using region-based noise measurements were less accurate than sequentially acquired estimates. Furthermore, these SNR estimates cannot reliably measure relative SNR with common sequence parameters modifications. Impact: SNR measured from sequential images in the brain and abdomen demonstrated that DLR improved SNR. Results from single-image noise estimates were inaccurate. Further, results from known parameter modifications demonstrated that DLR underestimated the expected relative SNR differences in all methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McNabb et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: