What type of study is this?

This is a Quantitative Study study.

Ultrashort echo-time (UTE) functional lung imaging for fractional ventilation quantification: breath-hold vs. free-breathing

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Free-breathing UTE outperformed breath-hold UTE in generating fractional ventilation maps, indicating clinical adaptability.

Free-breathing UTE method produced better fractional ventilation maps compared to breath-hold UTE.
Breath-hold UTE method resulted in low contrast FV maps in both healthy volunteers.
The proposed free-breathing UTE method improves success in clinical functional lung imaging.
Both UTE methods were tested on healthy individuals to assess their performance in fractional ventilation quantification.

Liang et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Free-breathing UTE outperformed breath-hold UTE in generating fractional ventilation maps, indicating clinical adaptability.

Free-breathing UTE method produced better fractional ventilation maps compared to breath-hold UTE.
Breath-hold UTE method resulted in low contrast FV maps in both healthy volunteers.
The proposed free-breathing UTE method improves success in clinical functional lung imaging.
Both UTE methods were tested on healthy individuals to assess their performance in fractional ventilation quantification.

Liang et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark