Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Free-breathing UTE outperformed breath-hold UTE in generating fractional ventilation maps, indicating clinical adaptability.
Motivation: Ultrashort echo-time (UTE) technique has recently gained attention in functional lung imaging for deriving quantitative maps including fractional ventilation (FV). Breath-hold UTE method can be easily utilized in clinical practice. However, failures in maintaining breath-hold often occur in clinical settings. Goal(s): To propose a free-breathing UTE method based on respiratory gating and compare its performance with breath-hold UTE method. Approach: Both breath-hold and free-breathing UTE methods were performed in two healthy volunteers to calculate FV maps for comparison. Results: Breath-hold UTE method produced FV maps with low contrast in both subjects, while free-breathing UTE method obtained FV maps with good contrast. Impact: The proposed free-breathing UTE method is straightforward to implement in clinical practice, and can provide satisfactory quantitative FV maps in subjects who fail to maintain breath-hold, improving the success rate of clinical UTE functional lung imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: