Comparative analysis highlights UTE's sensitivity for lung nodules, suggesting a safe alternative to MSCT.
Motivation: MSCT, used to examine lung nodules, poses ionizing radiation risks, hindering long-term follow-up; thus, MRI and ultra-short echo time (UTE) are preferable. Goal(s): We compared UTE with MSCT to provide a non-radiative lung nodule examination protocol. Approach: Two radiologists interpreted the UTE images; another radiologist matched them one-to-one with the MSCT results. Results: UTE's sensitivity was 88% for detecting solid nodules ≥4 mm and 100% for subsolid nodules ≥8 mm. MSCT and UTE measured similar average nodule diameters. Lung-RADS v2022 classifications were consistent between both methods. UTE may be a radiation-free alternative for examining lung nodules. Impact: UTE, an emerging non-radiative examination protocol, demonstrates great potential in detecting, diagnosing, and providing short-term follow-up of lung nodules and is poised to become an important tool for early screening and diagnosis of lung cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: