This review compares energy consumption of open MRI and higher-field systems, highlighting sustainable practices in imaging.
Motivation: This review compares the sustainability of open MRI machines and higher-field systems. It finds open MRIs more energy-efficient and patient-friendly, while higher-field systems offer better efficiency and diagnostic quality. Goal(s): The research evaluates energy consumption and operational efficiencies, considering the machine's lifespan and provides insights for sustainable MRI technology. Approach: The study will analyse peer-reviewed data to compare the two MRI types, identify best practices, and recommend sustainable strategies. Results: It will highlight best practices and future research directions for sustainable imaging. Impact: The research stresses the need for informed decision-making in MRI technology selection to improve patient outcomes and promote environmentally responsible practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tashriqah Bassa (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: