Observational study assessed fMRI activation maps for the Pyramids and Palm Trees task in patients, suggesting improved language mapping viability.
Motivation: Debate continues around the validity and best practices for clinical fMRI, driven partly by limited comparability between tasks used during fMRI versus intra-operative language mapping. Goal(s): To determine the reliability of a fMRI implementation of the Pyramids and Palm Trees task. Approach: Observational study in healthy controls (scanned twice) and presurgical patients with a brain tumour (scanned once on different MRI scanners) using a consistency mapping approach applied to task activation maps. Results: The PPTT fMRI task was easy for participants to complete and produced activation maps that were consistent between individuals, over time and across separate scanners. Impact: The availability of comparable paradigms for use in pre-surgical fMRI as well as during intra-operative awake testing may help to improve evaluations of the clinical relevance of fMRI predictions in patients undergoing awake glioma surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: