Observational analysis assessed CBF quantification in arterial spin labeling, indicating optimal inflow accounting.
Motivation: For velocity-selective arterial spin labeling (VSASL), a scaling factor (SIB) was recommended to correct the saturation recovery of arterial blood right before labeling. However, the SIB value needs to consider the inflow effect. Goal(s): To account for the inflow of fresh, unsaturated spins due to the limited coverage of the transmit body coil into VSASL-based CBF quantification. Approach: The SIB was measured using none-selective and slab-selective saturation with varied saturation times, respectively. Results: Slab-selective saturation with a 2.0s delay yielded optimal tSNR efficiency and SIB=0.90 provided more accurate CBF estimation than a simple saturation recovery model. Impact: To account for inflow effects, VSASL-based CBF quantification should use a slab-selective saturation with a 2.0s delay for optimal tSNR efficiency, and apply a scaling factor of 0.90 for more accurate CBF estimation than relying on the saturation recovery model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: