Observational analysis assesses whole-brain perivascular space volume in D-CAA, indicating potential for tracking disease progression.
Motivation: Most commonly used methods to assess enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) are visual rating scales that exhibit a strong ceiling effect and are limited to a single slice, limiting the assessment of progression. Goal(s): To develop and apply a method to quantitatively assess whole-brain PVS in Dutch-type Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (D-CAA). Approach: We applied a semi-automatic method with an in-house developed tool to assess whole-brain PVS volume fraction (PVSvf) over four-year follow-up. Results: Significant baseline differences were observed. No group differences were seen between symptomatic, pre-symptomatic D-CAA and controls in PVSvf over four years of follow-up. Impact: Sensitive measurement of PVS-enlargement will increase our understanding of disease mechanisms and allow monitoring of disease progression. This is relevant for developing treatment strategies and especially for tracking the effectiveness of treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schipper et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: