Comparative analysis highlights the superior sensitivity of multi-compartmental methods for multiple sclerosis lesions.
Motivation: There is a need for biomarkers that are specific to micrometer-scale cellular features in multiple sclerosis (MS). Goal(s): This study aims to evaluate and compare the sensitivity of various dMRI-based microstructural methods. Approach: We conducted a comparative analysis of five dMRI-based microstructural methods —DTI, DKI, SMI, SMT, and NODDI —assessing the ability of their parameters to differentiate four clinically-relevant white matter tissue types in MS: cBHs (chronic black holes), T2-lesion, cBHs-NAWM, and T2-NAWM. Results: Unlike DTI and DKI, only the multi-compartmental SMI, SMT, and NODDI can effectively distinguish cBHs from T2-lesions, highlighting their potential as more specific biomarkers for MS-related white matter changes. Impact: This study provides a better understanding of how multiple widely-used diffusion methods characterize MS lesions, which can assist in identifying the most effective imaging techniques for more accurate diagnoses in MS clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: