Comparison reveals artificial intelligence outperforms MRI and TRUS in measuring prostate volume and accuracy.
Motivation: There is a lack of standardization in the measurement of prostate volume. Goal(s): To assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in prostate volume evaluation. Approach: Comparing the consistency of prostate volume estimations by AI, MRI and TRUS when compared to the volume obtained from manual planimetry. Results: AI outperformed MRI and TRUS in volumetric evaluation of prostates, particularly in cases of irregular-shaped prostates. Impact: AI can automatically segment the prostate contours and demonstrates outstanding accuracy and reproducibility in estimating prostate volume. The advancement also empowers the promotion of PSA density, optimizes prostate cancer detection and ultimately offer clinical information for improving patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: