Analysis reveals tractography maintains accuracy in anisotropic sampling scenarios, suggesting algorithm robustness.
Motivation: Several studies have established tractography's sensitivity to anisotropic spatial sampling; however, the direct comparison between the performance of different algorithms has only been shown quantitatively on a simulated dataset. Goal(s): We aim to characterize the effect of anisotropic spatial sampling on bundle-wise tractography across algorithms compared to a high-resolution ground truth. Approach: We down-sample high-resolution ground truth data to anisotropic sampling. We up-sample the anisotropic data to isotropic for further comparison. Results: We show that tractography is robust to anisotropy with minimal biases if the beginning and end of pathways are well-defined. Impact: We show that some algorithms, when paired with well-defined beginning and endpoints for major pathways, show stability in highly anisotropic data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McMaster et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: