Comparative analysis evaluates LLMs’ effectiveness in automating TNM staging, highlighting few-shot learning's role.
Motivation: The potential of large language models (LLMs) in automating complex medical tasks, such as TNM staging from breast cancer DCE-MRI reports, remains unexplored. Goal(s): To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ChatGPT 4.0, ChatGPT 3.5, and Google Bard in automating TNM staging using zero-shot and few-shot learning approaches. Approach: We analyzed 745 DCE-MRI reports using different LLMs and learning strategies, assessing intra- and inter-LLM agreement, accuracy, and AUC. Results: ChatGPT 4.0 demonstrated superior performance (AUC: 0.89 in few-shot learning) compared to other models. Few-shot learning significantly improved all models' performance, with Bard showing the largest improvement (14.8 percentage points increase in AUC). Impact: This study demonstrates the potential of LLMs, especially ChatGPT 4.0, in automating breast cancer TNM staging from DCE-MRI reports. The effectiveness of few-shot learning suggests a pathway for rapid adaptation of AI in radiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic efficiency and accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: