Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates automated TNM staging improves accuracy in lung cancer prediction, indicating potential for enhanced clinical workflow.
Motivation Accurate TNM staging from lung cancer radiology reports is crucial for treatment planning and prognosis assessment. Manual staging processes are time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. Large language models (LLMs) offer opportunities to automate TNM staging with enhanced interpretability and clinical reasoning. Results We developed two complementary systems for automated TNM staging from English radiology reports. System I employs GPT-4o with reasoning-based few-shot learning and multi-step voting. System II integrates multiple LLMs (GPT-4o and Gemini-2) using DSPy framework with MIPROv2 optimization. In NTCIR-18 RadNLP 2024 English main task, our approaches achieved first (joint accuracy: 0.6543) and second place (joint accuracy: 0.6296), demonstrating superior performance in T, N, and M classification with accuracies of 0.7037/0.9136/0.8889 and 0.7284/0.9383/0.8395, respectively. Availability and Implementation Source code freely available at https://github.com/nlptmu/multi-expert-tnm-staging under MIT license. An archival snapshot of the version used in this study is deposited on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20338561. Implemented in Python 3.12+ with PyTorch 2.6 and DSPY 3.0, supporting Linux. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: