CFD analysis demonstrates a 51.2% scour reduction for combined sacrificial-pile and collar systems in bridge piers, suggesting enhanced structural resilience.
This study presents a high-fidelity CFD-based optimization of a combined sacrificial-pile and collar (SPC) system designed to suppress local scour at circular bridge piers. Following rigorous validation against benchmark flume experiments (scour depth error < 3%), a systematic parametric study was conducted to quantify the influence of pile-to-pier spacing (dp/D = 4–6) and collar elevation (hc/D = 0–0.3). The optimal layout is found to be a sacrificial pile at dp/D = 5 and a collar at hc/D, which yields a 51.2% scour reduction relative to the unprotected case. Flow field analysis reveals that the pile wake deflects the lower approach flow, while the collar vertically displaces the horseshoe vortex; together, these mechanisms redistribute bed shear stress and prevent secondary undermining. Consequently, the upstream conical pit is virtually eliminated, lateral scour is broadened but markedly shallower, and the downstream dune tail bifurcates into two symmetrical ridges. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study presents the first high-fidelity CFD-based optimization of a combined sacrificial-pile and collar (SPC) system with a fully coupled hydrodynamic-morphodynamic model. The optimized layout yields a 51.2% scour reduction relative to the unprotected case and, more importantly, demonstrates a positive non-linear synergy that exceeds the linear sum of individual device efficiencies by 7.5%. The findings offer practical design guidance for enhancing bridge foundation resilience against scour-induced hydraulic failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: