Analysis of power view in social ontology reveals potential exclusion of children from collective theories.
In Nonideal Social Ontology: The Power View , Åsa Burman argues that leading theories in social ontology fail to capture important aspects of our social world when they characterize it as paradigmatically cooperative and develops her power view to capture the centrality of power and conflict in our social lives. While Burman’s view is timely and compelling, I suggest that her arguments against the leading theories’ claim that collective intentionality is a constitutive element of our social reality drive her own view toward individualism, and that this, in turn, can lead to the continued exclusion of children from our social theorizing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayana Samuel (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: