Qualitative exploration reveals insights on children's harmful sexual behavior interpretation by victim-survivors, suggesting a need for effective policy adaptations.
Victim-survivors of children's harmful sexual behaviors have rarely been given a voice in academic research. The aim of this study, funded by the Australian National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse, was to establish how victim-survivors interpret their experiences of harmful sexual behavior. Research questions were as follows: (1) How do victim-survivors interpret their experiences of harmful sexual behavior? (2) How do researchers inform those interpretations? Twenty-five victim-survivors of children's harmful sexual behavior participated. Interpretivist Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was adopted for the methodological design. Semi-structured interviews were carried out between October 2023 and January 2024. Five constructs emerged through the data analysis: (1) Shifting identities; (2) Unspeakable betrayal; (3) Tenacious resistance; (4) Alternative justice; and (5) Hard-won recovery. The results are discussed in relation to knowledge translation into policy and practice, and the current evidence base.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McKibbin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: