Retrospective cohort study finds high TRAb levels predict relapse and persistent positivity in Graves' disease, suggesting important clinical implications.
The association between high thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAb) titers at diagnosis and long-term outcomes following prolonged antithyroid drug (ATD) therapy in Graves' disease (GD) remains unclear. This study examined TRAb dynamics and outcomes in high-titer patients receiving prolonged ATD. In this retrospective cohort (2018-2021), 1,148 of 3,052 newly diagnosed GD patients met inclusion criteria (≥18-month ATD course, TRAb negativity before withdrawal, and ≥12-month follow-up). Initial TRAb levels were defined as low-titer (<5.25 IU/L, 3×upper normal limit [UNL]), intermediate-titer (5.25-10.5 IU/L), and high-titer (>10.5 IU/L, 6×UNL). Outcomes included TRAb dynamics, treatment duration, and relapse. High-titer patients required longer therapy (50 months vs. 30 months vs. 22 months, P<0.001) and slower thyroid-stimulating hormone normalization (6 months vs. 4 months vs. 2 months, both P<0.001). TRAb negativity at 24/48 months occurred in 91.85%/99.26% (low-titer), 52.38%/75.24% (intermediate-titer), and 12.70%/52.68% (high-titer) (P<0.001). High-titer patients showed fluctuant (46.20%) or smoldering (28.89%) trends. Remission rates declined with higher TRAb titer (60.45% vs. 42.70% vs. 30.47%, P<0.001). High-titer patients showed increased risk of persistent TRAb positivity (2.17-fold; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55 to 3.05) and relapse (1.66-fold; 95% CI, 1.45 to 3.22). Thresholds of 10.90 IU/L and 16.01 IU/L predicted positivity and relapse, respectively. Definitive therapy post-relapse was more common in high-titer patients (38.29% vs. 16.98% in low-titer, P<0.001). High TRAb titers strongly predict persistent TRAb positivity and relapse after ATD withdrawal. Cut-off at 10.90 and 16.01 IU/L may guide prognosis and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: