Experimental results demonstrate enhanced optical properties and electrical conductivity in copper-doped ZnO, suggesting significant material advancements.
Copper-doped zinc oxide (CZO) nanomaterials were prepared by the co-precipitation method, with a 0.5 M ZnCl2 solution as the starting material, doped with 0-5 wt.% CuCl2. The 100 wt.% Cu sample, synthesized without Zn, acts as a pure CuO reference. A 1 M NaOH solution was used as the precipitating agent to adjust the pH to 10. The final product was calcined at 500 °C for 3 h. Morphological analysis using SEM revealed that the CZO samples with 0-5 wt.% Cu exhibited a rod-shaped morphology, whereas the 100 wt.% Cu sample displayed a sheet-like structure with mixed nanoparticles. XRD confirmed the hexagonal wurtzite crystal structure in CZO with no detectable secondary phases, indicating successful incorporation of Cu2+ ions into the ZnO lattice. Elemental composition analysis using EDS supported this finding, showing a progressive increase in Cu content from 0.83 wt.% at 1 wt.% doping to 6.03 wt.% at 5 wt.%, accompanied by a corresponding decrease in Zn content. These results suggest that Cu2+ ions were effectively substituted for Zn2+ within the crystal lattice without forming impurity phases. Optical properties and energy band gap analysis, conducted using fluorescence and ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, indicated optimal conditions at 1 wt.% Cu doping. This level corresponded to the lowest band gap energy and the highest electrical conductivity value of 2.71 ´ 10-3 (Ω·cm)-1, demonstrating a strong correlation between optical absorption and electrical performance. This study presents a systematic investigation into the effect of low-level Cu doping on the structural, optical, and electrical properties of ZnO nanomaterials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Detchaiyaphum et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: