Coupled-channel analysis reveals vector charmonium poles in e+e− interactions, suggesting exotic hadron structures.
Recent high-precision <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msup><a:mi>e</a:mi><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:msup><a:msup><a:mi>e</a:mi><a:mo>−</a:mo></a:msup><a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo><a:mi>c</a:mi><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>c</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">¯</a:mo></a:mover></a:math> data from BESIII and Belle are highly useful to understand vector charmonium (<f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mi>ψ</f:mi></f:math>) pole structures and puzzling line shapes due to the exotic hadron candidates <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:mi>Y</h:mi></h:math>. We, thus, perform a global coupled-channel analysis of most of the available data (ten two-body, nine three-body, and one four-body final states) in <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mrow><j:msqrt><j:mrow><j:mi>s</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msqrt><j:mo>=</j:mo></j:mrow><j:mn>3.75</j:mn><j:mtext> </j:mtext><j:mo>−</j:mo><j:mn>4.7</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mtext> </j:mtext><j:mi>GeV</j:mi></j:mrow></j:math>. Not only cross sections, but also invariant-mass distributions of subsystems are fitted. The <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:msup><l:mi>e</l:mi><l:mo>+</l:mo></l:msup><l:msup><l:mi>e</l:mi><l:mo>−</l:mo></l:msup><l:mo stretchy="false">→</l:mo><l:msup><l:mi>μ</l:mi><l:mo>+</l:mo></l:msup><l:msup><l:mi>μ</l:mi><l:mo>−</l:mo></l:msup></l:math> cross sections are also predicted. Our model includes dozens of (quasi-)two-body states that nonperturbatively couple with each other through bare <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>ψ</o:mi></o:math> excitations, particle-exchange, and short-range mechanisms; approximate three-body unitarity is considered. The amplitudes obtained from the fit are analytically continued to <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>ψ</q:mi></q:math> and <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:msub><s:mi>Z</s:mi><s:mi>c</s:mi></s:msub></s:math> poles. We find <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi>ψ</u:mi></u:math> states similar to those in the Particle Data Group listing and <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:mi>Y</w:mi><w:mo stretchy="false">(</w:mo><w:mn>4320</w:mn><w:mo stretchy="false">)</w:mo></w:math>. Moreover, several <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mi>ψ</ab:mi></ab:math> states, including new ones, are found close to open-charm thresholds. Trajectories and compositeness of the near-threshold poles suggest dominant hadron-molecule contents in their internal structures. Two <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msub><cb:mi>Z</cb:mi><cb:mi>c</cb:mi></cb:msub></cb:math> poles are found as virtual states <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><eb:mo>∼</eb:mo><eb:mn>40</eb:mn><eb:mtext> </eb:mtext><eb:mtext> </eb:mtext><eb:mi>MeV</eb:mi></eb:math> below the <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><gb:msup><gb:mi>D</gb:mi><gb:mo>*</gb:mo></gb:msup><gb:msup><gb:mover accent="true"><gb:mi>D</gb:mi><gb:mo stretchy="false">¯</gb:mo></gb:mover><gb:mrow><gb:mo stretchy="false">(</gb:mo><gb:mo>*</gb:mo><gb:mo stretchy="false">)</gb:mo></gb:mrow></gb:msup></gb:math> thresholds, consistent with lattice QCD results. This work presents the first global analysis to determine <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mb:mi>ψ</mb:mi></mb:math> and <ob:math xmlns:ob="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ob:msub><ob:mi>Z</ob:mi><ob:mi>c</ob:mi></ob:msub></ob:math> poles, thereby paving the way to extracting detailed properties of the prominent exotic hadron candidates from data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamura et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: