Analysis reveals a breach of the social contract affecting security and legitimacy in Nigeria's democracy.
Insecurity has become a defining feature of contemporary Nigeria, undermining both the safety and freedom of its citizens. The escalation of terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, and herder–farmer conflicts has generated widespread displacement, economic stagnation, and a climate of fear that corrodes trust in government. Against this backdrop, this paper undertakes a Hobbesian inquiry into the relationship between freedom and security, framed by the social contract tradition. Drawing on the insights of Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Rawls, as well as Weber and Tilly’s perspectives on statehood, the study argues that the Nigerian government’s inability to safeguard lives and property constitutes a fundamental breach of the social contract. The paper reviews manifestations of insecurity across Nigeria, analyzes government responses, and explores the consequences of the breached contract for legitimacy, democracy, and development. It concludes that restoring the social contract requires more than military action. It demands a comprehensive approach that integrates effective security provision, institutional reform, social justice, and inclusive governance. By situating Nigeria’s crisis within philosophical and political science debates, the study demonstrates both the enduring relevance of classical contract theory and the urgent need to rethink legitimacy in fragile democracies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asuquo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: