Cross-sectional survey reveals learning style preferences in first-year MBBS students, suggesting no link to academic performance.
Background:Learning styles represent different approaches to learning that can influence how effectively students assimilate information. The VARK model classifies learning styles into four modalities: Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic. Recognising students' preferred learning styles may help to optimise educational strategies, particularly in demanding fields such as medical education. Aim:This study aimed to identify the predominant learning style preferences among first-year MBBS students and to evaluate any associations between these preferences and their academic performance. Methods:A cross-sectional survey was conducted among second- and third-year medical students who had completed their first-year MBBS examinations. Data on age, sex, and subject-specific marks were collected, and the VARK (Version 8.01) questionnaire was administered to determine individual learning style preferences. Statistical analyses compared the distribution of preferred learning style by sex and by academic achievement, with significance assessed using appropriate software. Results:Among 126 participants (70 females, 56 males), quadmodal (multimodal) was the most commonly reported preference (33.3%), followed by unimodal (33.3%), bimodal (16.7%), and trimodal (16.7%) learning styles. The Kinaesthetic modality was the predominant unimodal preference. No significant differences in learning style distribution were observed between male and female students. Academic performance did not significantly correlate with any specific learning style; high and low performers exhibited similar distributions of learning preferences. Conclusion:Multimodal learning styles are the most prevalent among first-year MBBS students, and there is no significant association between learning style preference and academic achievement. These results underscore the value of incorporating diverse teaching methods to accommodate various learning preferences within the medical curriculum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: