This study demonstrates how generative artificial intelligence improves assessment design, suggesting a new collaborative framework.
Effective assessment development requires collaboration between multidisciplinary team members, and the process is often time-intensive. This study illustrates a framework for integrating generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) as a collaborator in assessment design, rather than a fully automated tool. The context was the development of a 12-item multiple-choice test for social work interns in a school-based training program, guided by design-based research (DBR) principles. Using ChatGPT to generate draft items, psychometricians refined outputs through structured prompts and then convened a panel of five subject matter experts to evaluate content validity. Results showed that while most AI-assisted items were relevant, 75% required modification, with revisions focused on response option clarity, alignment with learning objectives, and item stems. These findings provide initial evidence that GenAI can serve as a productive collaborator in assessment development when embedded in a human-in-the-loop process, while underscoring the need for continued expert oversight and further validation research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: