Survey analysis reveals how digital capability and risk perceptions shape entrepreneurial intentions, indicating a complex landscape of affordances and apprehensions.
Digitalization is reshaping entrepreneurship, yet the mechanisms that translate new technological possibilities into entrepreneurial intention remain poorly understood, especially for resource-constrained small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Building on the Theory of Planned Behaviour, Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking Theory and Affordance Theory, this study proposes and tests an integrated model that captures how individual cognition, digital capability and platform-related risk interact to shape digital entrepreneurial intention (DEI). Survey data from 428 Greek SME owner-managers were analyzed with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Results show that entrepreneurial self-efficacy, financial risk tolerance, digital literacy and perceived platform affordances each exert significant positive effects on DEI, whereas perceived platform risk exerts a significant negative effect. Importantly, platform risk also dampens the positive impact of self-efficacy, revealing a boundary condition often overlooked in intention research. The findings position digital transformation as a double-edged phenomenon amplifying opportunity through affordances while simultaneously magnifying risk. The study advances theory by integrating risk perceptions and affordance recognition into a TPB framework, and it offers actionable guidance: policy makers should stabilize digital-regulatory regimes, platform providers should increase transparency and reliability, and SME support programs should blend digital-skills training with calibrated risk-management tools. Together, such measures can convert latent entrepreneurial confidence into resilient digital venture creation. This study contributes to theory by extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour with risk-sensitive boundary conditions, broadening Risk-Taking Theory to account for platform-specific uncertainties, and validating Affordance Theory in a digital SME context. Practically, it provides actionable guidance for entrepreneurs, policymakers, and platform operators on balancing digital capability development with systemic risk governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skandalis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: