Analysis reveals how satire and parody challenge notions of rationality and human identity in literature, highlighting their role in shaping epistemic frameworks.
This paper explores the intersection of satire, parody, and scientific paradigms in Time’s Arrow by Martin Amis and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick. Both novels deploy satire and parody to challenge dominant notions of rationality, ethics, and human identity. Amis manipulates temporality to reveal the ideological mechanisms that frame historical atrocities as rational progress, while Dick blurs the human/nonhuman divide, uncovering the artificial foundations of technoscientific conceptions of identity. As contemporary shifts in artificial intelligence, digital media, and geopolitical power reshape knowledge production, literature continues to play a crucial role in interrogating shifting epistemic frameworks. By analyzing these works, this article examines how satire and parody function as conduits between literature and scientific discourse, illustrating their ability to challenge and destabilize entrenched systems of thought.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unai Izquierdo Berasaluce (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: