Finds cognitive and mental health improvements in college students via reading methods, indicating benefits of paper and audio formats.
Background Rising anxiety and depression among college students demand effective interventions. While reading benefits mental health, the comparative effects of different reading methods (paper, digital, audio, video) remain unclear. Methods Two thousand eight hundred sixty students were screened (SAS/SDS) and randomized into paper (PTR), digital (ETR), audio (ALR), video (VIR), or control groups. All groups read Lao She’s works with positive psychology themes for 8 weeks. Cognitive (CFQ, BRIEF-A) and mental health (SAS/SDS) outcomes were measured. Results PTR and ALR most effectively improved cognitive function (reduced CFQ scores) and mental health (lower anxiety/depression). ETR showed modest benefits, while VIR had minimal impact. The control group showed no improvement. Conclusion Paper and audio reading are optimal for enhancing cognition and mental health in students, offering practical guidance for evidence-based interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamei Liu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: