Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis demonstrates spherical forms optimize energy in structures, indicating broad applications across disciplines.
This article analyzes the energy efficiency of various geometric figures- sphere, cube, and pyramid- under equal volume conditions. The research is based on two main physical models: surface tension energy for liquids and internal elastic energy model for solid bodies. The results of theoretical calculations and Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis demonstrate that the spherical form is the most optimal geometric shape in terms of minimizing both surface energy and internal elastic energy. Stress Concentration Factor (SCF) and internal energy calculations prove that the geometric structures of forms directly affect stress distribution and overall energy consumption. The findings of the research explain the widespread use of spherical forms in nature (cells, droplets, planets), engineering (pressure vessels, aerodynamic capsules), architecture and design (domed structures, circular planning, spherical buildings), as well as in symbolic and cultural domains, using fundamental physical laws. This multidisciplinary approach demonstrates that form-function relationships are universal at technical, architectural, design, and symbolic levels. It has been determined that the dominant role of sphericity in nature, technology, architecture, and culture is governed by energy optimization principles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasin Khalilov (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: