Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 17, 2025Journal of Neuroscience

Forewarned Is Forearmed: The single- and dual-brain mechanisms in Detectors from Dyads of Varying Social Distance During Deceptive Outcomes Evaluation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RHRui HuangXGXiao‐Wei GaoCZChenyu Zhang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Hyperscanning reveals how social distance influences deception detection, indicating neural synchrony plays a key role.

Key Points

  • Detectors are more prone to deception in gain contexts, indicating a vulnerability in evaluating deceptive outcomes.
  • Interpersonal neural synchrony between the dorsolateral and orbitofrontal prefrontal cortices can reliably predict deception success.
  • Friend dyads show higher neural synchrony than stranger dyads during gain-loss evaluations, suggesting relational dynamics at play.
  • The INS-based Support Vector Regression model achieved an accuracy of 86.66% in predicting deceptive outcomes.

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4605931b076d99fa5fdcdhttps://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2129-24.2025
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk1979 · 48,360 citations
  2. 2Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series2004 · 6,412 citations
  3. 3How short is short? Optimum source–detector distance for short-separation channels in functional near-infrared spectroscopy2015 · 350 citations
  4. 4Attentional biases to threat in social anxiety disorder: time to focus our attention elsewhere?2018 · 27 citations
  5. 5A machine learning approach predicts future risk to suicidal ideation from social media data2020 · 217 citations