Prospective cohort study links higher visceral adiposity index to arterial stiffness progression, suggesting potential risks.
Objective: To investigate the association of Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI) with arterial stiffness progression. Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study, which included participants who completed at least 1 measurement of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) between 2010 and 2016, with complete physical examination data during the same period, and completed baPWV measurement during follow-up. The time of completing the first baPWV measurement was defined as the baseline. All participants were divided into 4 groups according to quartiles of baseline CVAI (<60.84, 60.84-89.67, 89.68-117.45,≥117.46). The baPWV progression was calculated (baPWV progression=(baPWVfollow-up-baPWVbaseline)/duration of follow-up). We assessed the association of CVAI groups with baPWV progression using multivariate linear regression models. Results: A total of 17 261 participants were included. Of these, the age was (47.6±11.6) years, and 11 285 (65.38%) were males. The results of multivariate linear regression models showed that compared with the CVAI<60.84 group, the baPWV at baseline increased by 39.62 cm/s (95%CI 28.57-50.67, P<0.01) in the 60.84-89.67 group, 76.37 cm/s (95%CI 64.71-88.04, P<0.01) in the 89.68-117.45 group, and 92.83 cm/s (95%CI 80.53-105.14, P<0.01) in the≥117.46 group. The median follow-up time was 2.49 years. Compared with the CVAI<60.84 group, annual change of baPWV progression increased by 17.17 cm/s (95%CI 10.36-23.97, P<0.01) in the 60.84-89.67 group, 24.59 cm/s (95%CI 17.38-31.80, P<0.01) in the 89.68-117.45 group, and 25.75 cm/s (95%CI 18.13-33.36, P<0.01) in the ≥117.46 group. Conclusion: Higher CVAI is closely associated with the progression of arterial stiffness, and the arterial stiffness progression accelerates with increased CVAI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: