Observational study shows systemic adipose-derived stem cells improve wound healing in irradiated mice, suggesting potential for clinical use.
Background: Radiotherapy is a well-established cancer treatment, but its detrimental effects on normal tissue have been significantly underestimated. Late radiation-induced tissue damage leads to dysfunctions like loss of elasticity and delayed wound healing, which negatively affect the prognosis and quality of life of cancer survivors. Our previous research demonstrated that local prophylactic administration of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) immediately after irradiation could prevent late radiation-related disorders. This study aims to explore the effects of systemic administration of ASCs for future clinical applications. Methods: Nude mice were irradiated on their dorsal skin (40 Gy total: 2 Gy × 20, simulating clinical radiotherapy). Human ASCs were administered systemically (via intravenous or intraperitoneal injection, once or twice). Control groups included a non-irradiated group and a vehicle-treated radiotherapy group. After 6 months, full-thickness skin wounds were created on the mice’s dorsal skin and observed for 28 days. The wound healing process was assessed, and tissue samples were analyzed using immunohistochemistry. Results: Radiotherapy caused subcutaneous fat atrophy and fibrosis at 6 months, which was effectively prevented in the ASC-treated groups. Wound healing was faster in the ASC-treated groups than in the vehicle-treated groups, though not as fast as in the No-radiotherapy group. ASC-treated groups exhibited less fat layer atrophy and fibrosis than vehicle-treated groups. Engraftment of ASCs was confirmed in the fatty layer of the irradiated skin. Conclusions: Prophylactic systemic administration of ASCs immediately after radiotherapy can prevent tissue damage and dysfunction associated with radiation therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toyohara et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: