Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 17, 2025European Labour Law Journal

From ‘general’ to ‘context-specific’ data protection for workers: Insights from the EU rules on platforms, algorithmic management and AI systems

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AAAntonio AloisiAJAnne JoppeHAHalefom H. Abraha

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals gaps in current data protection regimes affecting workers, highlighting the need for tailored frameworks.

Key Points

  • The expansion of algorithmic management systems in workplaces reveals significant data protection gaps.
  • The analysis of EU regulations—GDPR and PfWD—shows systemic weaknesses in safeguarding workers' digital rights.
  • The regulatory interplay among GDPR, AIA, and PfWD reveals critical overlaps and tensions affecting data protection.
  • A sector-specific focus limits the effectiveness of the PfWD in achieving comprehensive worker protection and governance.

Cite This Study

Aloisi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d461b631b076d99fa606e1https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525251375031
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Regulating AI in the workplace: A critique of the EU AI act and the platform work directive through a worker-centred lens2025
  2. 2Algorithmic Management in the Platform Work Directive: Fixing the GDPR?2025
  3. 3Reconciling risk and workers’ rights: The EU's risk-based approach to algorithmic management and its implications for labour law2026
  4. 4Algorithmic management of platform workers: An examination of the Canadian and European approaches to regulation2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5The challenges of AI regulation: data protection, civil rights, and landmark cases2026