This study shows a novel method for parallelism measurement in guide rails, suggesting improved accuracy and cost efficiency.
This study proposes a method for measuring guide rail parallelism based on position-sensitive detectors (PSDs), establishing a comprehensive uncertainty assessment framework. Parallelism errors are calculated using the public benchmark method and least squares fitting, with uncertainty components quantified via a dissemination of the value of quantity model. The reliability of the assessment is verified using the Monte Carlo method, yielding a 95% confidence interval of 10.0–14.0μm. The innovative introduction of a conjugate prior Bayesian framework enables dynamic updating of repeatability uncertainty, reducing the expanded uncertainty by 10% (from 2.0μm to 1.8μm, k=2). Comparative laser interferometer experiments demonstrate that while the interferometer offers higher precision (0.8μm), the PSD system maintains 1.8μm accuracy at a 33% lower cost (from ¥300,000 to ¥200,000). It supports 8 hours of operation without an external power supply, offering superior portability and industrial adaptability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: