Qualitative case study reveals communication challenges and gaps in disaster preparedness for deaf individuals, highlighting urgent policy needs.
Deaf people belong to the vulnerable group. Disaster readiness of the Deaf, remains a critical gap in both policy and practice. This study explores the experiences of deaf individuals in relation to emergency preparedness through a qualitative case study design, employing thematic analysis with open, axial, and selective coding. The concept of “readiness” is the central theme that serves as the “igniting factor to fuel up to goals to be safe in times of emergency. There were nine major themes that has emerged with subthemes highlighting barriers and coping mechanisms. Lip reading, sign language, and visual gestural communication were used to draw information during the interview. The findings reveal that Deaf individuals face significant communication challenges during emergencies, limited institutional support, and often depend on self-reliance and peer collaboration to ensure safety. Despite existing disaster preparedness programs, inclusivity remains superficial and compliance-based. Recent literature reinforces the need for disability-sensitive frameworks, accessible drills, and government accountability in policy enforcement. Implications highlight the urgency of integrating sign language, visual communication systems, and tailored training into community and institutional preparedness plans. This study provides a foundation for policymakers, educators, and health professionals to design inclusive, sustainable strategies that empower deaf individuals in disaster contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowell Bernard T. Dawat (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: