Molecular simulation reveals insights on methanol's nonideal behaviour in Nafion's diverse water channel morphologies, highlighting adsorption variations.
Fuel loss inside direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) having Nafion membranes with two distinct water channel morphologies (viz., lamellar water channel morphology (LWCM) and random water channel morphology (RWCM), both validated against the literature having comparable equivalent weights and membrane densities) has been quantified through a methanol adsorption (ρCH3OH) study using GCMC simulations. Subsequently, variations in nonideality of adsorbed methanol as a function of Nafion-water-methanol local mole fractions are estimated at DMFC operating conditions, which are governed by ρCH3OH inside different morphologies. For all temperatures with given hydration (λ), ρCH3OH values are significantly higher inside LWCM with a single ordered channel compared to RWCM with localized hydrophilic regions and inherent tortuosity. While ρCH3OH decreases with increasing λ inside LWCM, inside RWCM, ρCH3OH is constantly lower at λ = 3 and varies relatively for λ = 6 and 9, depending on the DMFC operating temperature. Pore volume and active site availability in hydrated Nafion result in a competitive arrangement of methanol with respect to the bound water and hydronium mixture, only at the LWCM centre and at localized hydrophilic sites of RWCM. These observations have been justified further by estimating the preferential solvation parameters. Interestingly, the molecular ordering of bound water inside all Nafion remained invariant upon methanol adsorption. However, enhanced molecular ordering of adsorbed methanol in comparison to its pure bulk phase also indicates the possibility of activity coefficients (γCH3OH) < 1 inside hydrated Nafion. Calculations of excess entropy substantiate ρCH3OH,LWCM > ρCH3OH,RWCM, at constant water compositions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santhamma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: