PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Aerospace3 citationsOpen Access

Reinforced Model Predictive Guidance and Control for Spacecraft Proximity Operations

View Full Paper
LCLorenzo CapraABAndrea BrandonisioMLMichèle Lavagna

Key Points

  • Autonomous AI-based guidance improves spacecraft proximity operations, ensuring better trajectory planning.
  • Deep reinforcement learning utilizes partially observable markov decision processes for effective guidance tasks.
  • Model predictive control enforces trajectory compliance, addressing the challenges related to optimality in AI methods.
  • The proposed solution shows improved safety and explainability over traditional approaches in spacecraft motion control.

Abstract

An increased level of autonomy is attractive above all in the framework of proximity operations, and researchers are focusing more and more on artificial intelligence techniques to improve spacecraft’s capabilities in these scenarios. This work presents an autonomous AI-based guidance algorithm to plan the path of a chaser spacecraft for the map reconstruction of an artificial uncooperative target, coupled with Model Predictive Control for the tracking of the generated trajectory. Deep reinforcement learning is particularly interesting for enabling spacecraft’s autonomous guidance, since this problem can be formulated as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process and because it leverages domain randomization well to cope with model uncertainty, thanks to the neural networks’ generalizing capabilities. The main drawback of this method is that it is difficult to verify its optimality mathematically and the constraints can be added only as part of the reward function, so it is not guaranteed that the solution satisfies them. To this end a convex Model Predictive Control formulation is employed to track the DRL-based trajectory, while simultaneously enforcing compliance with the constraints. Two neural network architectures are proposed and compared: a recurrent one and the more recent transformer. The trained reinforcement learning agent is then tested in an end-to-end AI-based pipeline with image generation in the loop, and the results are presented. The computational effort of the entire guidance and control strategy is also verified on a Raspberry Pi board. This work represents a viable solution to apply artificial intelligence methods for spacecraft’s autonomous motion, still retaining a higher level of explainability and safety than that given by more classical guidance and control approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Capra et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d461c231b076d99fa6104chttps://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12090837
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stability and Performance Verification of Dynamical Systems Controlled by Neural Networks: Algorithms and Complexity2022 · 12 citations
  2. 2A survey on artificial intelligence trends in spacecraft guidance dynamics and control2019 · 278 citations
  3. 3Actor-Critic Model Predictive Control2024 · 63 citations
  4. 4Model Predictive Control of Swarms of Spacecraft Using Sequential Convex Programming2014 · 388 citations
  5. 5Deep reinforcement learning for six degree-of-freedom planetary landing2020 · 196 citations