Experimental findings reveal improved mechanical properties in 3D-printed continuous fiber composites, suggesting effective resin impregnation methods.
Compared with traditional continuous plant fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites, their 3D-printed counterparts offer distinct advantages in the rapid fabrication of complex geometries with integrated forming capabilities. However, the impregnation process of continuous plant fiber yarn with thermoplastic resin presents greater technical challenges compared to conventional synthetic fibers (e.g., carbon or glass fibers) typically employed in continuous fiber composites, owing to the yarn’s unique twisted structure. In addition, low molding pressure during 3D printing makes resin impregnation more difficult. To address the impregnation difficulty within plant fiber yarn during 3D printing, we employed two low-viscosity resins, liquid thermoplastic resin (specifically, reactive methyl methacrylate) and thermosetting epoxy resin, to pre-impregnate flax yarns, respectively. A dual-resin prepreg filament is developed for 3D printing of flax fiber-reinforced composites, involving re-coating pre-impregnated flax yarns with polylactic acid. The experimental results indicate that liquid thermoplastic resin-impregnated composites exhibit enhanced mechanical properties, surpassing the epoxy system by 39% in tensile strength and 29% in modulus, attributed to improved impregnation and better interfacial compatibility. This preparation method demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing liquid thermoplastic resin in 3D-printed continuous plant fiber composites, offering a novel approach for producing highly impregnated continuous fiber filaments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: