PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Frontiers in Nutrition6 citationsOpen Access

Mapping of the adherence to the planetary health diet in 11 European countries: comparison of different diet quality indices as a result of the PLAN’EAT project

View Full Paper
FGFederica GrantVAVittoria AureliJVJacopo Niccolò Di Veroli

Key Points

  • Low adherence to the planetary health diet was seen across all 11 European countries, especially among men.
  • Higher average normalized scores were achieved using the EAT-Lancet index compared to WISH 2.0, while regional patterns were evident.
  • Cluster analyses were performed to identify dietary pattern variation by country and gender, highlighting cultural dietary behaviors.
  • WISH 2.0 demonstrated better alignment with actual food consumption data, suggesting it may be a more effective tool for mapping dietary quality.

Abstract

Introduction The Planetary Health Diet (PHD) is a nutritional approach integrating public health and environmental sustainability aspects. This study, conducted within the European PLAN’EAT project, aimed to assess adherence to PHD in 11 European countries. Methods Three dietary quality indices were used: the EAT-Lancet index; the original WISH; and a newly developed version, WISH 2.0. This last index incorporates two additional food categories: processed meat and alcoholic beverages. The inclusion of these categories was driven by their recognized public health and environmental relevance. The food consumption data was retrieved from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database. Scores were calculated and normalized to carry out descriptive and comparative analyses. Cluster analyses were also performed to examine dietary pattern differences by country and gender. Results Low adherence to PHD was observed across all countries. However, Southern European countries such as Italy, Greece, and Spain showed comparatively higher adherence, particularly among women. Cluster analyses, based on EAT-Lancet and WISH 2.0 scores, highlighted regional and gender patterns. These findings emphasize the cultural specificity of dietary behaviors. The two indices have different discriminating capacities. From the EAT-Lancet index, higher average normalized scores were obtained. WISH 2.0 could distinguish between different dietary patterns and was better aligned with actual food consumption data, demonstrating an enhanced capacity to better detect national dietary patterns more accurately. Discussion These results underscore the potential of WISH 2.0 as a comprehensive and practical instrument for mapping and monitoring dietary quality in Europe. Additionally, the findings indicate that adapting global dietary guidelines to local contexts may be essential to improve population-level adherence and policy relevance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grant et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d461cb31b076d99fa61181https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1645824
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them2019 · 2,907 citations
  2. 2Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic assessment2015 · 845 citations
  3. 3Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 20172019 · 5,910 citations
  4. 4Generalising Ward’s Method for Use with Manhattan Distances2017 · 246 citations
  5. 5Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change2023 · 2,595 citations