Magnetic and x-ray diffraction measurements show pressure-induced superconductivity in a Fe compound, indicating new material properties.
Abstract Magnetic measurements under hydrostatic pressure (P) up to 10 kbar and x-ray diffraction measurements up to 10.7 kbar were performed for a single crystal of Fe0.975Cu0.025Te0.66Se0.34, which is non-superconducting at ambient pressure. In this compound, we have found pressureinduced recovery of the superconducting state at Tc equal to 13.0 K for P = 10 kbar. We determined the parameters characterizing the superconducting state, including the lower and the upper critical fields, coherence length, and penetration depth, and compared them with those for Fe0.99Te0.66Se0.34. We found that the lower critical field for Fe0.975Cu0.025Te0.66Se0.34 at 0 K and 10 kbar is comparable to the lower critical field for Fe0.99Te0.66Se0.34 at ambient pressure, while the upper critical field is significantly higher than that for Fe0.99Te0.66Se0.34 at ambient pressure. The estimated increase in superconducting carrier density and effective mass under pressure can be explained if one assumes that applied pressure leads to an increase in structural disorder in the studied material. At 10 kbar, the zero-field critical current density for Fe0.975Cu0.025Te0.66Se0.34 is four times larger than that for Fe0.99Te0.66Se0.34 at ambient pressure. The x-ray diffraction results indicate that under pressure crystal quality apparently degrades. Comprehensive studies of the impact of pressure on the crystal structure indicate an increasing mosaicity evolution with pressure, suggesting that the pressure-induced superconductivity of Fe0.975Cu0.025Te0.66Se0.34 originates from inhomogeneities, associated also with the superconductivity in other sulpho-iron selenotellurides and antiPbO-type structures. Obviously, the pressure effect on the crystallographic structure can lead to changes in the electronic structure, which is not excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piętosa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: