Panel data analysis reveals distinct impacts of command-and-control and market-based regulation, suggesting improved policy design is needed in the marine sector.
Introduction Upgrading China’s marine industrial structure toward sustainability and higher value is central to the nation’s strategy of becoming a maritime power. Environmental regulation plays a pivotal role in this transition, yet its influence in the marine sector remains insufficiently examined. Methods Using panel data from 11 coastal provinces, this study distinguishes between command-and-control and market-based regulation, and applies a threshold regression model to evaluate their respective impacts and interactions. Results The analysis reveals that command-and-control regulation follows an inverted U-shaped pattern: moderate enforcement encourages industrial optimization, while overly stringent measures suppress innovation and slow transformation. Market-based regulation currently has a net negative effect, reflecting limited effectiveness under existing policy conditions. Nonetheless, evidence points to a potential U-shaped relationship, suggesting that better policy design and implementation could reverse this trend. Threshold results further show that while command-and-control regulation is unaffected by market-based intensity, strong command-and-control enforcement markedly weakens the impact of market-based tools. Discussion These findings underscore the need to calibrate regulatory intensity and improve coordination between regulatory instruments. A balanced mix of policies, tailored to the specific dynamics of the marine economy, can help unlock the full potential of environmental regulation and support high-quality, sustainable growth in China’s marine industries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: