Cross-sectional study examines aortic arch types and branching patterns in patients, highlighting surgical challenges.
Background: To determine the frequency of aortic arch types and branching pattern variations in a cohort of patients and assess their surgical relevance. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 72 patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) or surgical exploration between June 2023 and June 2024. Arch types (I–III) and branching patterns (classic three-branch, bovine arch, aberrant right subclavian artery, vertebral origin variants, right-sided arch) were classified. Surgical outcomes including operative time, intraoperative adjustments, and complications were analyzed. Results: Type I arch was most frequent (63.9%), followed by Type II (23.6%) and Type III (12.5%). Classic branching pattern was seen in 62.5% of participants, while 37.5% had variations, most commonly bovine arch (20.8%). Patients with variant branching had significantly longer mean operative time (215 ± 30 min vs. 188 ± 25 min, p = 0.03) and required more intraoperative adjustments (p = 0.04), though rates of stroke and 30-day mortality were not significantly different. Conclusion: Aortic arch variations are relatively common and have measurable effects on surgical complexity. Preoperative imaging and individualized planning are critical to reducing operative challenges and optimizing outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naveed et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: