September 18, 2025JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUMOpen Access

Judicial Activism vs. Electoral Justice: The Overlooked Purcell Principle in Indonesia

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

RNRahmat Muhajir NugrohoUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan SSobirinUniversitas PGRI Semarang RGReyhan GymnastiarUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This article examines the tension between judicial activism and electoral justice, highlighting the Purcell Principle's implications for Indonesia's constitutional framework.

Key Points

Judicial activism by the Constitutional Court creates legal uncertainty during elections, impacting electoral justice.
The Purcell Principle offers a model to prevent last-minute electoral law changes, fostering electoral stability.
Directly applying the Purcell Principle in Indonesia is challenging due to differences in legal systems and democratic processes.
The limited Purcell principle adapts the doctrine to Indonesia with key pillars aimed at protecting constitutional rights.

Cite This Study

Nugroho et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d462db31b076d99fa62813 https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art5

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This article examines the tension between judicial activism and electoral justice, highlighting the Purcell Principle's implications for Indonesia's constitutional framework.

Judicial Activism vs. Electoral Justice: The Overlooked Purcell Principle in Indonesia

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Judicial Activism vs. Electoral Justice: The Overlooked Purcell Principle in Indonesia

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider