Life cycle assessment highlights the environmental benefits of biogas integration and sludge reuse in fluoride removal, indicating significant pollution reduction.
Industrial wastewater is a significant source of environmental pollution. This study conducts a life cycle assessment (LCA) of fluoride removal from mineral industry ef-fluents via an electrocoagulation process, incorporating CO₂ derived from biogas for pH regulation and electricity cogeneration. The LCA includes five subsystems: elec-trocoagulation, pH adjustment, sedimentation, pumping, and sludge transport. Three scenarios were evaluated: S1, which employed hydrochloric acid for pH adjustment; S2, which used biogas exclusively for pH regulation and S3, which utilized biogas for both pH control and power generation. The overall environmental impact followed the order S3 < S1 < S2, with S3 achieving approximately a 50% reduction in impact com-pared to S1. Among these, the electrocoagulation unit exhibited the highest environ-mental impact. However, in Scenario 3 (S3), the pH adjustment subsystem demon-strated a net environmental benefit due to extra electricity generation. Furthermore, the valorization of electrocoagulation sludge as a raw material for bricks contributed to additional impact reduction. Sludge reuse was implemented in all scenarios. Human health was the most affected category, with primary contributors including human non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity, global warming potential, marine ecotoxi-city, and fine particulate matter formation. The findings underscore the environmental advantages of biogas integration and sludge valorization in industrial wastewater treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nigri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: