This single-center study reports tumor response and survival outcomes in patients with combined small-cell lung cancer, suggesting immunotherapy may be beneficial.
Background Combined small-cell lung cancer is a rare subtype of SCLC, which is characterized by the coexistence of SCLC with any histological type of non-small cell lung cancer. There is limited clinical data. We aimed to explore the clinicopathological features and prognosis of C-SCLC patients who received anti-tumor therapy. Methods Eligible patients were histopathologically confirmed adult C-SCLC who received anti-tumor treatment at Sir Run Run Hospital. This analysis aimed to describe the clinicopathological characteristics and evaluate the tumor response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Thirty patients were included. Eighty-three point three three percent were male, and sixty-six point six seven percent were non-smokers. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 11/30) and adenocarcinoma (AC; 11/30) were the most frequently observed mixed components, followed by large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC; 8/30). Patients received immunochemotherapy (13/30), platinum-based chemotherapy (9/30), or anti-EGFR-/anti-VEGF-based therapy (8/30). Most patients used the anti-PD-1 inhibitor Serplulimab (n=7). Among 27 patients with measurable disease, the RR and DCR were 51.85% (95% CI: 31.95 - 71.33%) and 85.19% (95% CI: 66.27 - 95.81%), respectively. The median PFS was 9.70 months (95% CI: 4.37 - 18.73). The median PFS of C-SCLC mixed with LCNEC was higher than that of those mixed with AC or SCC (10.62 vs. 9.70 vs. 4.17 months; P = 0.858); patients are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy than from chemotherapy and targeted therapy (9.70 vs. 5.27 vs. NR months; P = 0.685). Conclusion Our findings provide a basis for systematic treatment strategies in C-SCLC and suggest that patients may derive benefit from immunotherapy, although further studies are needed to confirm these observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: