Introduction: Cadaveric dissection has long been a fundamental component of anatomy education, providing students with a hands-on, three-dimensional understanding of the human body. However, the integration of alternative teaching methods, such as dissected specimens, anatomical models, and digital tools, has raised questions about the relevance of traditional dissection. This study explored the perspectives regarding the role of cadaveric dissection and the learning experience of medical students in a newly established medical faculty in Sri Lanka. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among preclinical and clinical students who had previously engaged in cadaveric dissection. Responses were collected via an online questionnaire assessing their views on its benefits, challenges, and comparison with modern educational resources. Results: Among 427 participants, the majority agreed that dissection reinforced theoretical knowledge, improved retention, and enhanced their spatial understanding of anatomical structures. Many students also felt that it prepared them for surgical training and increased their respect for the human body. While some acknowledged the advantages of alternative learning tools, most opposed replacing dissection entirely. Conclusion: The study highlighted the continued importance of cadaveric dissection in medical education, despite logistical challenges. A hybrid approach, integrating traditional dissection with emerging technologies, may offer an effective learning experience. Strengthening infrastructure and faculty support for dissection-based teaching will be crucial to maintaining its relevance in the evolving medical curriculum.
Chandimal et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: