Ambispective analysis shows lower toxicity with DPYD-guided dosing in colorectal cancer patients, suggesting improved treatment outcomes.
Introduction Fluoropyrimidines (FP) are the mainstay of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, but can cause severe toxicity in up to 40% of patients. Variants in the DPYD gene are associated with these adverse events. A DPYD -guide dose adjustment is now recommended in Europe. This ambispective study aims to analyze the FP-related severe toxicity and the FP dose adjustment in heterozygous DPYD variant carriers with colorectal cancer, comparing a DPYD -guided FP dose adjustment (DA) approach to the non- DPYD -guided FP dose adjustment (NDA). Methods 1.279 DPYD genotyping reports were issued. Sixty patients were identified with DPYD variants. Twenty-five CRC patients (17 in the DA cohort and 8 in the NDA cohort) were included in the analysis. Thirty-five patients were excluded from the analysis because they did not satisfy any of the study’s inclusion criteria. Reasons for exclusion included having a diagnosis other than colorectal cancer, not receiving fluoropyrimidine treatment, participation in a clinical trial, or insufficient follow-up. Results Of the twenty-five patients included, sixteen patients (94%) started with a 50% FP dose reduction in the DA cohort while 7 out of 8 patients (87%) in the NDA cohort received 100% of dose in cycle 1. In the DA cohort, 12% of patients experienced severe fluoropyrimidines-related adverse events, compared to 50% in the NDA cohort (OR = 0.13; 95%CI: 0.01–0.93; p = 0.05). FP discontinuation due to severe toxicity occurred in 6% of patients in the DA cohort versus 50% in the NDA cohort (OR = 0.06; 95%CI: 0.003–0.55, p = 0.02). Discussion These findings suggest that DPYD -guided dose adjustment significantly reduces both the incidence of severe toxicity and the rate of treatment discontinuation in CRC patients. Initiating treatment with a 50% FP reduction allows for dose escalation in patients who exhibit good tolerance and avoid the discontinuation for those patients intolerant to higher doses thereby improving overall treatment adherence and completion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosas-Alonso et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: