Analysis shows that military spending has a short-term effect on GDP in Iraq, suggesting potential misallocation of resources.
General Background: The relationship between military spending and economic growth has long been debated, with contrasting theoretical perspectives suggesting either positive stimulus effects or harmful crowding-out impacts. Specific Background: Iraq represents a critical case, as the post-2003 political and security instability substantially reshaped its public expenditure structure, with military allocations absorbing significant resources. Knowledge Gap: While prior studies have examined this relationship in Iraq, few have applied advanced econometric approaches across the extended period of 2004–2023, leaving uncertainty regarding short- versus long-term effects. Aims: This study analyzes the impact of military spending on Iraq’s GDP using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model to evaluate both short-run and long-run dynamics. Results: The findings reveal that military spending has only a short-term effect on GDP, while no significant long-term relationship exists. Moreover, excessive reliance on consumer-oriented military expenditures, coupled with weak domestic defense industries, limited Iraq’s capacity to translate security outlays into sustainable economic growth. Novelty: By applying ARDL modeling to two decades of Iraqi data, this study provides a nuanced distinction between transitory and persistent impacts of defense spending. Implications: The results suggest that fiscal policies should balance security needs with investments in productive sectors, redirecting resources toward infrastructure, education, and healthcare to foster long-term stability and growth.Highlight : Military spending in Iraq was mostly consumer, not productive. The ARDL model confirmed only a short-term impact on GDP. High defense focus reduced resources for education, health, and infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huda Z. Miklif (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: