Observational analysis elucidates drug interactions in M. tuberculosis, highlighting the BPaL regimen's complexities.
A key challenge in preclinical tuberculosis drug development is identifying optimal antibiotic combinations. Drug interactions are complex because one drug may affect Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ) physiology in a way that alters the activity of another drug. Conventional pharmacodynamic evaluation based on colony-forming units (CFU) does not provide information about this physiologic interaction because CFU enumerates bacteria but does not give information about the drug’s effect on bacterial cellular processes. SEARCH-TB is a novel pharmacodynamic (PD) approach that uses targeted in vivo transcriptional profiling to evaluate drug effects on Mtb physiology. To evaluate SEARCH-TB’s capacity to elucidate drug interactions, we deconstructed the BPaL (bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid) regimen in the BALB/c high-dose aerosol mouse infection model, measuring the effect of 2-, 7-, and 14-day treatment with drugs in monotherapy, pairwise combinations, and as a three-drug combination. Monotherapy induced drug-specific Mtb transcriptional responses by day 2 with continued evolution over 14 days. Bedaquiline dominated pairwise combinations with pretomanid and linezolid, whereas the pretomanid-linezolid combination induced a transcriptional profile intermediate between either drug. In the three-drug BPaL regimen, adding both pretomanid and linezolid to bedaquiline yielded a greater transcriptional response than expected, based on pairwise results. This work demonstrates that physiologic perturbations induced by a single drug may be modified in complex ways when drugs are combined. This establishes proof of concept that SEARCH-TB provides a highly granular readout of drug interactions in vivo, providing information distinct from CFU burden and suggesting a future where regimen selection is informed by in vivo molecular measures of Mtb physiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wynn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: